So, you have found your “dream”
home, set deep in rural countryside.
However, is it a dream or a (potential) nightmare?
As you may, or may not, be aware, the rules governing Septic Tanks and Sewage Packet Treatment Plants change on 1 January 2020.
From 1 January, 2020, all Septic
Tanks and Sewage Packet Treatment Plants must be made to comply with the
Environment Agency’s General Binding Rules within a reasonable time. It is suggested that 12 months may be
reasonable. However, if a system is
already causing pollution a much shorter time would be appropriate.
Sellers and Buyers need to deal
with this issue early to avoid delays in transactions.
Septic tanks are designed to
settle the waste matter and to subsequently discharge this into a correctly
designed drainage field. Discharge must
not flow to a tunnel or soakaway or in the case of a septic tank directly to
A drainage field can best be described
as an infiltration system made up of a series of rigid pipes with holes or
slots, placed in trenches, over drainage stone and arranged in a closed loop
design so that the effluent can trickle through the ground to be treated by
bacteria in the underlying soil.
The septic tank itself is an
underground settlement tank which allows the solids to sink to the bottom,
forming a sludge and the floating solids and dead bacteria float to the top
thereby forming a crust leaving the resulting septic liquid to flow out to a
The new or upgraded septic tank or sewage packet
treatment plant must be of the correct size and installed by a professional.
The system must, of course, be of a size suitable to the number of persons
residing in the subject property and is not a hit and miss affair.
Of course, it is a sensible idea
to regularly have the tank emptied –
usually annually dependent upon its size and the amount of people using
it. There are various “warning signs”
that a septic tank is failing and these can include:-
smells around the area where the tank is sited.,
grass growing in the vicinity of the tank.,
noises emanating from the plumbing, to name but a few
Possible causes are the tank “backing
up” which will require it to be emptied more frequently, tree/shrub roots
growing through the walls of the tank or a “collapsed baffle,” which is, in essence,
a very serious issue where could allow solids to flow into the soakaway system
which is only designed to deal with liquid waste. Ultimately, if this happens, then waste and
waste water may well back up into the property itself!
A lot of the smaller tanks, i.e.
serving just one family home, are granted an Exemption Certificate by the
Environment Agency, and you would be wise to enquire as to one does already
If you are considering selling or purchasing a property with such apparatus, then you are strongly advised to obtain specialist advice as to whether the system is working properly and as to suitability of the system to ensure no action be rendered against you by the Environment Agency and to avoid any delays in the transaction.
If you require any advice on the above topic please don’t hesitate to contact Kim Thurston or any member of the team on 01793 848900.
is proud to partner with Cancer Research UK in our will writing partnership,
enabling supporters of the charity to have a simple will written or updated for
free using the Free Will Service. People who use the service often choose to
leave a gift in their will to the charity. Cancer Research have shared with us
some examples of the impact these gifts make to local cancer research.
difficult for surgeons to see and remove all cancer cells during surgery. So,
some can get left behind. This can lead to the cancer coming
back. In Oxford, Professor Freddie Hamdy is tagging
prostate cancer cells with fluorescent dye. Testing whether this will make them
easier to see, remove and examine during surgery. This approach
could help surgeons remove all cancer cells to stop the cancer returning.
This is only one of the projects you
could contribute to by leaving a gift in your Will to Cancer Research UK.
Gifts in Wills breathe life into
researchers’ work by funding over a third of their life-saving research.
Legacies enable long-term research projects that allow scientists to achieve
breakthroughs every day. Each breakthrough inspires the next until the day
comes when everyone survives cancer.
Cancer Research UK has made a pledge
to their supporters. 82p in every £1 they receive goes towards funding vital
research like Professor Hamdy,
while the other 18p helps raise more funds to support research.
In the past 40 years, survival has
doubled in part thanks to Cancer Research UK’s pioneering research, funded by
the generosity of their supporters. Cancer Research UK is committed to ensuring
3 in 4 people in the UK who are diagnosed with cancer survive their disease for
10 years or more by 2034. None of this will be possible without the help of
You can find out more about leaving a
gift in your Will to Cancer Research UK today by visiting www.cruk.org/legacies.
We have specialists in all three
offices who deal with this type of work:
want every client to have a great customer service experience. The only way we
can find out if this happens, is by asking you.
This is very important to us – so we hope you feel
able to share your experience with us.
Hundreds of clients share their feedback with us every
year, and it helps shape our staff training, how we answer the telephone, what
changes we make, and so on. We really do read each and every single feedback
So, as you can see, your experience
matters to us.
Today we thought we’d share some positive feedback received from a client about their experience with our Property Team. This transaction was particularly difficult and, with the clients permission, we would like to thank Kim Thurston, a Residential Conveyancer in our Property Team.
all your hard work with the sale and purchase process over the last few months,
your assistance was invaluable. I will be recommending you to friends and
family when dealing with any other conveyancing work in the future based on
your efficient service and excellent professionalism in some difficult
A “landmark” piece of legislation known as the Domestic Abuse Bill is currently being debated in the Houses of Parliament. The Bill is currently on its second reading and has received cross party support.
If passed, the new legislation will
introduce the first ever statutory definition of domestic abuse, which will not
be limited to physical abuse and will include emotional, manipulative,
controlling and financial abuse. The importance of a statutory definition
cannot be underestimated, it will help everyone, including professionals such
as GP’s, solicitors and judges (as well as the victims themselves) understand
what constitutes ‘abuse’. Whilst it is easy
to identify physical violence as domestic abuse, emotional abuse and coercive
control is often considered a “grey area”. Without the relevant guidelines,
professionals can struggle to identify whether a victim has experienced
Psychological abuse can be just
as damaging and upsetting for victims as physical violence. Examples include
intimidating and threatening behaviour, aggressive shouting or constant
criticism or undermining, withholding finances or food, controlling all aspects
of their partner’s life such as when they go out, what they wear and who they
talk to. If your partner’s behaviour has left you feeling frightened, isolated
and unable to make your own choices, this Bill has been drafted to protect you.
Although this Bill has not yet
been passed, the Courts are increasingly aware of the seriousness of psychological
abuse. This is, in part, due to controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate
or family relationship being made a criminal offence in 2015.
If you have been a victim of
domestic abuse, whether physical or emotional, there are legal remedies available
to protect you. We can help you obtain an injunction, known as a Non-Molestation
Order, to protect you (and any children) from further harm. Such orders can
prohibit an abuser from using physical violence, intimidating or harassing you
and can even forbid a perpetrator from contacting you directly or indirectly.
Breach of a Non-Molestation Order can result in a fine or custodial sentence.
If you are still living with your
abuser or have been forced to flee the family home, we can help you obtain an
Occupation Order, which requires the abuser to leave the family home and allow
you peaceful and exclusive occupation of the property.
If you are experiencing domestic
abuse, please contact Heather Reilly on 01793 532363, to discuss how we can
help protect you from harm. Where appropriate, we are able to offer legal aid to
fund your application.
I have lost count of the
number of times Facebook is referred to in divorce petitions or social media
posts are stored and relied upon during Children Act and financial remedy
proceedings. Over sharing on social
media may be your downfall when it comes to family law cases as photographs and
posts can be held on to, by your ex, as a permanent reminder of historical
misdemeanours. The courts have
previously been presented with copy text messages and emails as evidence of
conduct and are now used to seeing a screengrab of an offensive photograph or
comment on social media and will accept this as evidence, if pertinent to your
Most importantly, it is
an offence to identify children who are subject to court proceedings (unless
specific authority has been obtained from the court) and therefore, you must
not publish details of your case online, no matter how upset or angry you may
feel about the process or the outcome.
Consider this: you emphatically deny to your spouse that you have bought a property or car or been on an
expensive holiday, whilst boasting about your spending (plus
a photo for good measure with you looking suitably proud) on social media. Your spouse is bound to rely upon that within
negotiations about division of matrimonial assets, at the very least to show
that you have been economic with the truth!
Uploading photographs and
sharing details of frivolous expenditure will not help you when you pursue an
argument concerning lack of resources and will instead assist your aggrieved
ex-partner online creates a permanent record which could later be referred to
as evidence of poor parenting, as could photographs or updates about drinking
to excess/drunken exploits or recreational drug use.
Family breakdown is an
extremely upsetting and stressful time and an outlet will be needed but be
warned that such outlet should be in private.
Consider not only the legal consequences which could be far ranging but
also the impact upon your children who may one day see the record of the public
fall-out between their parents.
When someone dies, it is sometimes necessary to apply for a Grant of Representation to deal with their estate. There are different types of Grant: executors named in a Will can apply for a “Grant of Probate”; if there is a Will but none of the executors can apply, others (usually the main beneficiaries) can apply for a “Grant of Letters of Administration With Will Annexed”; and if there is no Will, an application can be made for a “Grant of Letters of Administration”.
There have been two significant practical concerns this year relating to these applications. Firstly, a substantial increase in most fees was due to come into force in Spring 2019; and secondly, since Spring, there have been substantial delays in the processing of applications. The two problems are not entirely unrelated: there was a substantial increase in the volume of applications just before the original deadline for the fee change. Other contributing factors to the delay appear to have been a change in the format of the Grants coupled with a new computer system.
Under the government’s proposals, probate fees would have
risen from the current fixed fee of £215 – or £155 with a solicitor – to a
sliding scale of up to £6,000 depending on the size of the estate. However, it
has been confirmed that the Government Minister has decided allow the probate
fees increase to lapse.
As to the delays, it has recently been taking months rather than weeks to receive a Grant. The Law Society recently met with HM Courts and Tribunals Service and were told that a 20% increase in resources has been brought in to deal with the increase of applications and putting paper applications onto the new system, which they were told HMCTS is now up to date with. The challenge now sits at the quality assurance and final issue of grant stage.
HMCTS say they have processed 98,000 grants since April this
year and have a backlog of applications from March. These need to be dealt with
by people who have the appropriate skill/experience. They say they have brought
in an additional legal advisers and believe this should help with getting
through the backlogs.
It is therefore to be hoped that an end may at last be in
sight to the present delays.
If you would like any help or advice regarding Grants of
Representation, our Wills and Estates team would be happy to help.
Bevirs Law would like to congratulate Michelle Bowyer on her promotion to Associate Solicitor, following her successful track record in advising clients with family law issues including divorce, financial arrangements arising from divorce, and child arrangements for both parents and extended family members. She also deals with preparation of cohabitation and separation agreements as well as pre-nuptial agreements.
is an experienced
family lawyer, practising since 1996 and has been based in our Swindon office
since February 2014.
Michelle said: “I was thrilled to be offered an Associate
position this year. I will continue to support Stuart McNeil and
the rest of the fantastic family team I work with. I practice with a
passion for the law and with a drive to help my clients work through some of
the most challenging times they face. To be made an Associate of such a
lovely firm is validation of my efforts in both practicing law and in my care
of clients and I am grateful to the Partnership for this opportunity”.
Stuart McNeil, Partner
and Head of the Family Team, said: “Huge congratulations to Michelle on her
well deserved promotion. Michelle is a key member of the family team who has
proved time and again to be an extremely valuable asset to the firm as well as
being well thought of by her clients”.
only bad thing about the row is that I did not see England put 8 tries on
Ireland nor see the Ben Stokes innings.
were three themes that added to the already challenging task of rowing roughly
40 miles a day, almost caused us to fail.
The first is that, for once, the August Bank Holiday was a glorious
weekend of blue skies and unremitting sun.
Temperatures rose into the 30s which itself made the effort of rowing
difficult. Added to that, the sun
brought out a variety of other users to the Thames: there were the swimmers, some serious and some
just swimming from the riverbank; there were the canoeists and paddlers and, of
course, river cruisers of all shapes and sizes and a couple drifting in the middle of the Thames on a
unicorn more interested in their bodies than where
they were on the Thames. That activity
would have slowed us but the volume of cruisers wishing, like us, to go through
the locks meant that there was continuing and growing delay. Finally, the river Thames is not designed for
crew changes of row boats and that coupled to the instability of the boat as we
clambered in and out of it or entered or left locks meant that such times were
fraught and slow . Despite that the boat
was frequently tipping dangerously towards capsizing. All in all, the estimated time of arrival at
the end of each day just kept on being pushed further and further back.
of the delays we all spent longer in the boat than was planned. The killer stints were where one rowed then coxed and then rowed
again. This meant that one was in the
boat continuously for five to six hours. Not only was that tiring but also painful on
the backside. This lead one member of
the team, Sowande, to exclaim as he got into Lyn’s car “ah, just let me sit in
your car – the seats are so soft”.
all that in mind as I recount the highlights or
lowlights of the row.
Saturday the 24th August the two rowing crews assembled at Lechlade Marina
at about 7.00am. The two teams were the
younger members ‘The Young Blades’ and the more, shall we say, mature members ‘The
Gentlemen’. First there were the photos, the crew, the crew and Stuart McNeil
from Bevirs Law, our sponsors, representatives from The Lions, who made a very
generous donation, and the Mayor. Once
that was done, the boat was launched and The Young Blades plus the Cox, me
embarked. Cheers of encouragement from the supporters and we were off – straight
into the side of the narrow outlet to the Thames.
Thames at Lechlade is, for several miles, very pretty but is also narrow and
very windy. Not ideal for a boat which
is designed to go in a straight line.
That, coupled with the ineptitude of the Cox, me, and the fact that we occasionally
forgot the difference between stroke side and bow side, meant that we formed a
close relationship with the overhanging trees and growing reeds. Progress was slow but we comforted ourselves with
the thought that when the Thames widened we would make up time. Good theory but bad practice because the weather
got hotter and filled with other users.
arrived at our first night stop at Abingdon about an hour and a half late. We supped at the local Beefeater, where the
service was friendly but the food – ‘ho-hum’. The Young Blades were to take the first stint
and, taking into account, the previous day’s experience, intended on an early
of The Gentlemen were not needed and were given dispensation from leaving home between
4:30am and 5:00am. We needed as long as
possible to recover because the second day was the longest to row. The Gentlemen gathered at Clifton Lock at about
8 a.m. having walked past moored boats from which the smell of frying bacon
gently wafted making the taste buds tingle.
The early start had not quite happened.
The changeover was effected, but as the day got hotter, the locks fuller
and the changeovers undertaken with increasing care, we slipped further and
further behind the schedule. The planned
mooring was at the Marlow Rowing Club. As
the evening sun began to set, and darkness grew, we were still optimistic that
we would reach our destination. Unfortunately,
we had not taken into account the penultimate lock of the day. Lock keepers work 9 to 6. By the time we got to the penultimate lock 6
o’clock was well past. The problem was
that no one – not the crew, the Back Up Team or those standing by the lock knew
the mysteries of its operation. We
ineffectively pushed buttons and pulled levers but still the lock did not
change. Eventually, a man appeared who
took control, pushed the buttons and pulled the levers in the right sequence
and in and out we went. Not only that,
the man donated £50 to our cause. This
was one of several donations we collected on the journey.
now darkness had descended and the Cox, me, could not easily distinguish the
water from the bank, nor was I able to see that the boat that I thought we were
trying to overtake was actually coming straight towards us. The decision to abandon our efforts to reach
Marlow, was made as we approached Hurley Lock. I suddenly realised that our approach was not
the lock but the adjoining weir. The
cry of ‘Back row! Back row!’ stopped the impending disaster and to Hurley Lock
the lock side, and high above us, there were shadowy figures making helpful
suggestions as to what we should do.
None of those suggestions gained consensus. Suddenly, there was a man saying ‘It’s OK,
you can use my boathouse’. Some of the Back
Up Team and non-rowers, whilst searching for access to Hurley Lock, stumbled
into this man’s garden. He was having an
al fresco dinner with friends. Without hesitation,
he left his meal, came to the lock, made his suggestion, returned to his house
to find a torch and then, like a Cornish Wrecker, waved his light. We secured the boat in a mood of despondency,
occasioned by tiredness, if not exhaustion, and the failure to reach our
objective. That was not the end of the man’s
generosity as he then offered us sleeping accommodation in his house. The man was a star and lifted our
spirits. Having had our spirits lifted,
they were then sent descending as we discovered that the restaurant at which we
were intending to eat was now shut. Not
surprising, as we were some 2.5 hours late.
Did this mean that our only source of food in Marlow was the kebab
van? Among the Gentlemen was Peter
Mapson, who is known for enjoying good food and wine. His gastronomic nose found the Marlow Bar and
Grill. Not only did its kitchen stay
open for us, it served some seriously good food. If in Marlow do visit, I recommend.
spent the night in the Travelodge and in the morning returned to Hurley
Lock. The Gentlemen took the first stint
to the Marlow Rowing Club. We rowed as quickly
as we could to make up the time. Despite
that, and because the boat needed attention, the day proper again started
we thought the river had been busy and hot on the previous two days, it became
busier and hotter on day three. We were
now slipping seriously further and further against the schedule. An hour, an hour and a half, two hours. This led to discussions as to whether we could
achieve our goal, or only achieve it if we could return and row on Tuesday, or
whether we had to admit defeat and accept that the heat and the activity on the
river would beat us. Whilst no one wanted
that, the prospect was looming large.
a piece of luck. One lock keeper pointed
out that at the next lock there was a portage point. We rowed
towards it among shouts from various boats who had been queuing for a considerable
time of “there’s a queue you know!” and
manhandled the boat to the other side.
That gained us half an hour. We
now believed we could, not would, achieve our objective.
decision was then made that the greatest chance of success lay with The Young
Blades doing most of the remaining rowing, and with The Gentlemen joining in
when a Young Blade admitted he needed a break.
That was usually confessed through gritted teeth. Whilst I, and I think, the other Gentlemen
felt that this meant we were not pulling our full weight, it was the right
the number of miles remaining reducing steadily, we found another portage point
and again hauled the boat out and into the water. That, again, made up some lost time. From the
final changeover point, The Young Blades were rowing together with Alan as Cox. They rowed the last five miles at a cracking
pace, at some point reaching 12 miles per hour, and, eventually, finished at
the Lensbury Hotel at about 8:30pm.
Without The Young Blades we would have failed, so well done guys and thanks.
the question of thanks, there are three people who have only been obliquely
mentioned as ‘the Back-up Team’. That
consisted of Lin, Pauline and Lyn. I know
that they had assistance from others but they bore the brunt: getting up early, making sure that we rowers
had water, food, transport, tender loving care, and hauling increasingly tired
bodies in and out of the boat. One
measure of their efforts is that, between them, they walked some180,000 steps
during the three days. Remember, that was
done in the intense heat and whilst carrying heavy loads of water and food. Without those three we would have undoubtedly
failed – so a big THANK YOU.
also to the Reading Rowing Club who lent us the boat and, particularly, to Des
who taught us the rudiments of rowing and repaired the boat when we had a
to all those who have made donations. I
am uncertain as to the final amount, but it is heading to £12,000.00.
would I do the same again with The Young Blades and the other Gentlemen? Despite tiredness, heat and a sore backside “bet
your sweet bippy I would”.
This blog is not about
development, planning, green energy, compulsory purchase or CLUEDS. It is about 8 people over the August Bank
Holiday weekend rowing from Lechlade to Teddington Lock in aid of the NSPCC in
Some 15 years ago, the well know ( in Swindon) , Swindon 6 (at
that time 8) decided to row the same trip for the same cause. As this year is the 25th year of
fund raising in Swindon for the NSPCC the idea is mooted that we should do it
again. A little seed grew and now some
of are doing it again.
Unfortunately, of the original 8
only 4 are still rowing that is Alan Fletcher, Peter Mapson, Michael Shirley
and myself. On this occasion we are
being aided by 4 younger men. That sounds a good idea but as we have found
in training it creates it own problems.
We discovered the first problem at the Reading Rowing Club who are not
only generously lending us the boat but also through Des Norton giving us a lot
of help in training. Oh yes, we are in
training. The distance is 124 miles
which we intend to cover in 3 or 4 days.
That is a serious effort, but we shall do this in relays as the boat
only holds 4 and a Cox.
The first problem is that the
younger men (the boys) row with a longer stroke than us older men (the
gentleman). Initially this caused us
many problems as the oars were going in and out of the water at different
times. Not only was there no passing
resemblance to a smoothly operating rowing crew it meant that progress, when there
was any, was not running sleekly through
the water but bearing a remarkably resemblance to a car whose timing was
out. Start splutter stop start splutter
stop. We are still not rowing with the
style and rhythm of other rowers from the reading Rowing Club all whom seem to
make their boats pass serenely by with little or no effort and are a joy to
watch. We are however improving so that
we can get to a speed where our trainer on the bank (no he does not have a
megaphone nor a bicycle) has to break out to a gentle trot.
Another problem which affects
both the boys and the gentleman is getting in and out of the boat. This is a greater problem for us
gentleman. When we were first introduced
to the boat the aforementioned Des gave us clear instructions as to how this
was to be achieved most efficiently and safely.
The theory is fine but practice less so.
Not only is there the issue of getting into a boat which is only
slightly wider than the rowers then one has to bend into an even smaller
area. The idea is to gently sit on to
the sliding seat. That seat is clearly
malignant as it has the knack of never being immediately below you as you go to
sit down. It is always at the end of the
runner and where it firmly stays whatever encouragement you offer it.
Getting out has similar issues to
which must be added the difficulty of unbending oneself after an hour or two’s rowing. That
results in a stiffening back and lack of mobility.
Then there is the scariest part
which is putting the boat back in its resting place. This consists of lifting it out of the water
turning it through 180 degrees and then manoeuvring it over a floating platform
up on to the bank then into the boatyard.
The yard is now full of other boats of a similar ilk. All this has to be done without dropping the
damn thing and particularly not the berth below our berth in the rack. That is
because as Des told us on the first occasion, we manoeuvred the boat that it is
one of the GB boats.
All this effort is to enable us
to accomplish the row and raise a lot of
money for the NSPCC. If this blog inspires
you to make a donation I will be delighted.
The donation can be made either by contacting me at Bevirs or by donating
via the fundraising web page at www.justgiving.com/fundraising@fbccthamesrow2019
As the NSPCC says every child who is worth fighting for.
SWINDON ROWING TEAM – “COTSWOLDS TO CAPITAL”
24 – 26 AUGUST
2019 – Rowing 124 miles from Lechlade to Teddington
Bevirs are pleased to announce their sponsorship of this amazing challenge, helping raise money for the NSPCC.
Hugh Ellins, a Solicitor in our commercial team, is taking part in the challenge and will blog the trials and tribulations of training and competing in the challenge. Some 15 years ago Hugh Ellins was one of the original crew that decided to row the same trip for the same cause. As this year is the 25th year of fund raising in Swindon for the NSPCC they decided they should do it again!
In 1992 the NSPCC recognised the need for a physical centre in Swindon to help local children and their families suffering the consequences of child abuse. At that time, although there had been an Inspector based in the town for over 100 years, there was no building in which to provide these services and NSPCC could not afford to establish such a unit without local funding.
response some local businessmen and women formed a support group called
“Swindon Business Cares for Children” which raised sufficient money in a year
to purchase and equip a house which was officially opened as a Child Protection
Centre by Princess Margaret in November 1993.
then the Centre has continued to provide services to help children and their
families to recover from the impact of abuse. The team works with children who
have suffered from all types of abuse which includes physical, sexual and
emotional abuse, neglect and those who have experienced domestic violence.
level of demand for the services of the Centre has grown dramatically over the
years and over 800 children and adults were helped last year. Regrettably this
trend continues and, due to the inevitable financial constraints, there is a
waiting list of children in need of the services available at the Centre.
Business Cares for Children continues to raise money to support the running of
the Centre and since its inception has raised over £850,000. In 2005 the group
rowed from Lechlade to Teddington raising over £17,000 and this year’s row is
designed to replicate that event with four of the original team plus four of
the “next generation” of fundraisers. To celebrate the 25th
Anniversary of the opening of the Centre SBCC is committed to raising £25,000
to support the work undertaken there and this Thames Row is part of that
We would encourage anyone to help support this challenge by donating via their fundraising webpage at: